Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tezama "Urakumikyoku""
From NND Medley Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchimported>Rushy43 |
m (Barry B. Benson moved page Talk:Tezama Urakumikyoku to Talk:Tezama "Urakumikyoku") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Then what should we do with the page? [[User:Rushy43|Rushy43]] 01:18, 10 May 2011 (PDT) | Then what should we do with the page? [[User:Rushy43|Rushy43]] 01:18, 10 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Personally, I think we should delete it, remove the medley from the database, and ban masterofpokemon. [[User:Slypheristic|Slypheristic]] 06:41, 26 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree with removing it, but I'm not so sure about banning him... Technically, he's done nothing wrong. [[User:Rushy43|Rushy43]] 01:11, 27 May 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I personally wouldn't ban him for now. For all I know, all he did was create a page for a piece he (incorrectly) considered a medley. | ||
| + | Also, just wanted to remind you all that this page still needs removal (in case your decisions still stand). --[[User:Thumbsy|Thumbsy]] 15:53, 12 June 2011 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:57, 30 October 2024
Should this really be considered a medley? Rushy43 12:15, 1 May 2011 (PDT)
Nope. Slypheristic
Then what should we do with the page? Rushy43 01:18, 10 May 2011 (PDT)
Personally, I think we should delete it, remove the medley from the database, and ban masterofpokemon. Slypheristic 06:41, 26 May 2011 (PDT)
I agree with removing it, but I'm not so sure about banning him... Technically, he's done nothing wrong. Rushy43 01:11, 27 May 2011 (PDT)
I personally wouldn't ban him for now. For all I know, all he did was create a page for a piece he (incorrectly) considered a medley. Also, just wanted to remind you all that this page still needs removal (in case your decisions still stand). --Thumbsy 15:53, 12 June 2011 (PDT)
